<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Seo Lab</title>
	<link>http://www.seo-lab.com</link>
	<description>SEO blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:01:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>101 Link Building strategies</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A great post by Andy Hagans at SEO Book: 101 Ways to Build Link Popularity in 2006
Take special note of the section &#8220;71 Good Ways to Build Links&#8221;.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/08/22/101-link-building-strategies/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Clickthrough rates on SERPs</title>
		<description><![CDATA[0]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/08/22/clickthrough-rates-on-serps/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Testing Google indexing</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually Google does a pretty good job at indexing. Traditionally Google was more interested in capturing as much information from the web as possible.
More recently, it seems as though Google&#8217;s policy may have changed - though any existing indexing concerns may be due to Google&#8217;s bad data push.
I&#8217;ve seen this issue really acutely on a [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/08/01/testing-google-indexing/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Link experiment - when do duplicate links count?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the conundrum - if you find yourself linking to the same site twice on a page, or else linking the same keywords more than once, it can be difficult to tell whether the second or first link carries any value.
For example, if you do either of the following, then what are the actual link [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/13/link-experiment-when-do-duplicate-links-count/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to spot nofollow links the easy way</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you may be considering adding content to a third-party site, not least for link benefits.
Whether it&#8217;s a link exchange, forum link drop, blog comment, or article submission, the sites for links are available - but some throw in a nasty surprise by using the &#8220;nofollow&#8221; tag.
Looking through page code for nofollow is arduous at [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/13/how-to-spot-nofollow-links-the-easy-way/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tips for Google News syndication</title>
		<description><![CDATA[If SEO is about attracting targeted visitors, then methods that can legitimately increase your site&#8217;s exposure to extra traffic work well within that remit.
One way of doing this is via syndication, and one of the big daddy&#8217;s of this is Google News. Any site that can get itself syndicated via Google News can potentially tap [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/12/tips-for-google-news/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>SEO, Links, and Longtail</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Too often prospective clients are looking to capture traffic and sales from just a couple of different major keywords.
Often, these keywords are very similar – singular and plural versions of the same term, for example.
The real secret to working with keywords in links to work with as varied a spread of keywords of possible, in [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/08/seo-links-and-longtail/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Off-topic links work and are effective</title>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s a lot of general discussion on the need for “on-topic” links.
Google is perceived by some to particularly reward “on-topic” links.
But not every page with a link is going to be devoted to that topic – heck, you only have to consider Google itself. 
Consider how many times you see people link to Google – [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/08/off-topic-links-work-and-are-effective/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Web directories</title>
		<description><![CDATA[0]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/08/web-directories/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google is not the only search engine</title>
		<description><![CDATA[0]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/03/google-is-not-the-only-search-engine/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Articles for links</title>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the more recent “crazes” is to write articles to generate links,
It’s not a new method for SEO – it’s as old as the internet. The difference being, as Google becomes more restrictive on ranking criteria, article submissions have become a latest desperate grab for rankings.
The problem here is that while links across a [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/02/articles-for-links/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to beat the Google Sandbox</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Google Sandbox is an old system.
It was first noticed in April 2004, when volume link builders (such as myself) found that instead of immediate ranking effects from volume link building, as expected, it now took 3 months before those links would impact.
Since then the Google Sandbox has come to encompass a varied range of [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/07/01/how-to-beat-the-google-sandbox/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google errors as an opportunity</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In April Google attempted to overhaul their datacenter network with a new way of spidering the web, with a specific aim to save on bandwidth and increase efficiency.
The result was 3 months of Google problems, that Google later put down to a “bad data push”.
Key problems included sites disappearing from Google, or only having a [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.seo-lab.com/2006/06/30/google-errors-as-an-opportunity/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
